Skip to content
The Agentic Review

Independent analysis of agentic AI systems, products, and standards.

Vol. I · No. 1 · Est. 2026
HS

Staff engineer turned writer

Hadassah Stein

Hadassah Stein writes the Review's product-focused work — teardowns of agentic orchestration platforms, comparative reviews of frameworks, and the occasional long-form interview with a project's maintainers. She spent six years as a staff engineer on a multi-agent platform team before moving to writing full time. She brings a builder's impatience to product copy and a reviewer's patience to source.

Her column "Field Notes" runs whenever she has read enough code to have something to say, which is usually every other week. She writes from somewhere in Central Europe and is the person to contact for invitations to walk a journalist through your stack — provided you are willing to be reviewed in public after.

Hadassah does not invest in any of the companies she covers and has not held equity in any orchestration vendor since her transition to writing.

Joined

Pieces published

Contact

Covers

comparisonLangGraphCrewAIAutoGenplatformsagentic workforceWeb4OS

Pieces by Hadassah Stein

Conversations

Karpathy on Slop vs the Revenue Tape

Andrej Karpathy calls agentic AI 'slop.' Claude Code is at a $2.5B run-rate. Cursor is at $2B ARR. Devin's ARR went from $1M to $73M in nine months. Both readings are honest. The Review's attempt at why.

KarpathyClaude Code
Comparative

Comparative Notes: AutoGen, LangGraph, CrewAI, Web4OS

Four products. Four different bets about what an agentic system is. A qualitative teardown across topology, surface, scope, and the kind of user each one is for.

LangGraphCrewAI